Legal Opinion
James T. Conti v. Pneumatic Products Corporation and H. Michael McCurry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1992No. 91-3918Published
1Opinion of the Court
977 F.2d 978
61 USLW 2223
James T. CONTI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PNEUMATIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION and H. Michael McCurry,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-3918.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued May 7, 1992.
Decided Oct. 6, 1992.
William H. Blessing (argued and briefed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.
Peter E. Tamborski, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cincinnati, Ohio, Guy O. Farmer, II (argued and briefed), Foley & Lardner, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendants-appellees.
Before: GUY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges; and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge*.
RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
1
This is an…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.