Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Merchants' National Bank v. Elizabethtown National Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1906No. Appeal, No. 85PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 85, Oct. T., 1905, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Feb. T., 1904, No. 86, on verdict for plaintiff in case of The Farmers’ and Merchants’ National Bank of Winchester v. Elizabethtown National Bank. Assumpsit to recover the amount of a check. Before Landis, P. J. At the trial the court gave binding instructions for plaintiff. Verdict for plaintiff for $992.08, subject to question of law reserved.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 85, Oct. T., 1905, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Feb. T., 1904, No. 86, on verdict for plaintiff in case of The Farmers’ and Merchants’ National Bank of Winchester v. Elizabethtown National Bank. Assumpsit to recover the amount of a check. Before Landis, P. J. At the trial the court gave binding instructions for plaintiff. Verdict for plaintiff for $992.08, subject to question of law reserved. On a rule for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial, Landis, P. J., filed the following opinion: On May 27, 1903, Charles H. Harper presented to the…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed upon the opinion of the learned president judge of the common pleas.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bulliet v. Allegheny Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Hamburger Bros. & Co. v. Third National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Abrams v. UenkingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Schmitt v. Mellon National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Sokoloff v. Weisberg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API