People ex rel. Jacobs v. Murray
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Sixth District. The essential facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Cope, J. and Field, C. J. concurring.
This is a claim by the relator to the office of superintendent of the city cemetery of the city and county of Sacramento. The facts arise on the complaint, and the question of their sufficiency was raised by demurrer, which was overruled below, and judgment rendered for plaintiff—from which defendant now appeals.
On the eighth of January, 1858, the defendant was appointed to this office by the Board of Supervisors, under an ordinance of that Board, passed on the twenty-third of June, 1858. The second section of the ordinance is as follows: “ The Board of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gay v. City of BuckhannonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
- Yett v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- District Township v. Independent DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Tuohy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- State ex rel. Piper v. BattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.