Mayo v. Mills
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Sequoyah County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action in replevin by James M. Mayo and John R. Mayfield, of the firm of Mayo & Mayfield, against Thomas Mills and Lucy Mills. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
The petition in error and case-made in this appeal were filed in this court on January 11, 1910. No brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court, has been filed, and no excuse has been offered for the failure to so file, and by authority of Davis v. Elliott, 25 Okla. 433, 106 Pac. 838, the plaintiffs in error have waived then-right to have the appeal heard in this court, and the same is hereby dismissed.
See, also, LeBreton v. Swartzel, 14 Okla. 521, 78 Pac. 323; Walker v. Hannewincle, 24 Okla. 152, 103 Pac. 585.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
All…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davis v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Walker v. HannewincleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Lebreton v. SwartzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904