Legal Opinion

Gilcrease v. McCullough

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1919No. 167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

certiorari to the supreme court of the state of OKLAHOMA.’ The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the court.

Thomas Gilcrease, a Creek Indian of one-eighth blood, received, -under date of December 15, 1902, an allotment of surplus land under Act of Congress, March 1, 1901, c. 676, 31 Stat. 861, as amended by Act of June 30, 1902, c. 1323, 32 Stat. 500. On February 8, 1911, his twenty-first birthday, he executed to McCullough and Martin an oil and gas lease thereof. Later he brought suit in a state court of Oklahoma to set it aside, insisting that, under the applicable enrollment record of Creek citizenship, he must be assumed to have been under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. WildcatSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hutchison v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Heffner v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Rice v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Strawn v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Cully v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Stokes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bilby v. JacobsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Caton v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API