Legal Opinion

Hesse-Schnitt, Inc. v. Brahe

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, William F., J.

The above action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s hen against real property owned by the defendants Brahe. The case, apparently, was on the equity trial calendar for several terms and was finally referred to an official referee by stipulation of the parties. The plaintiff recovered judgment and was allowed costs by the official referee. Plaintiff taxed costs and entered judgment. However, it did not serve a notice of taxation or retaxation upon the defendants Brahe. Defendants Brahe make this motion for a retaxation of costs, claiming that two items of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. A. E. Nettleton Co. v. StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Case v. PriceNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Burnett v. WestfallNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Keystone Type Foundry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API