Legal Opinion · Dissent

Killingsworth v. Finne

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1993No. 1—90—2437Published

1DissentJustice Greiman

I must respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion states: “The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court’s order affirming the decision of the Commission is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.” 241 Ill. App. 3d at 1027.

However, on appeal, plaintiff raises two questions which are , within the scope of our review in these discharge cases.

The Illinois Supreme Court mandates a two-step process when reviewing an administrative agency’s decision to discharge an employee.

“A court’s scope of review of an administrative agency’s decision regarding discharge is a two-step process.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Siegel v. Levy Organization Development Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Walsh v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bell v. Civil Service CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Brown v. Civil Service CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Pelling v. Illinois Racing BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API