Legal Opinion

Hoyt Bros. v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1936No. 29408PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a suit in equity for an injunction to prevent Max Kier, city attorney of Lincoln, and William C. Condit, chief of police of Lincoln, from interfering with agents of plaintiff in soliciting in Lincoln orders for ordinary merchandise for future delivery. In violation of two city ordinances forbidding peddling without a license and without payment of an occupation tax, two agents of plaintiff solicited orders for merchandise for future delivery and were prosecuted and fined therefor. Continued prosecutions were threatened. The ordinances defined the taking-of orders for present or future…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. P. F. Petersen Baking Co. v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Caldwell v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hoover v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Best & Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Knights of Columbus, Chapter 2409 v. La. Dept. of Pub. Saf. & Corrections, Div. of State PoliceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Waste Connections of Nebraska, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Webber v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Speier's Laundry Co. v. City of WilberNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API