Legal Opinion

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Olympus Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 2, 1991No. 91-1011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Hewlett-Packard Company appeals from the final decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, denying reconsideration of the Board’s order dismissing Opposition No. 77,043 (April 10, 1990) with prejudice, because Hewlett failed to prosecute its case. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Olympus Corp., Opposition No. 77,043 (TTAB Aug. 14, 1990). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Hewlett timely filed a Notice of Opposition to registration of Olympus’ mark, based on Hewlett’s earlier use of “HP” on various medical instruments and power supplies. Included…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanyo Watch Co., Inc. v. Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Tiffany & Co. v. Columbia Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Hollister Inc. v. DowneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Firsthealth of the Carolinas, Inc. v. Carefirst of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Atlanta-Fulton County Zoo, Inc. v. David J. DePalma and Charlotte Wright DePalma, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board1998
  5. Cutino v. Nightlife Media, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API