People v. Thompson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Mercure, A.P.J.
*1140We affirm. Initially, we reject defendant’s argument that Supreme Court erred in refusing to compel pretrial disclosure of the grand jury testimony of the People’s ballistics expert.1 Pretrial discovery in criminal proceedings is governed by statute (see People v DaGata, 86 NY2d 40, 44 [1995]; Matter of Constantine v Leto, 157 AD2d 376, 378 [1990], affd for reasons stated below 77 NY2d 975 [1991]), and the relevant provision permits discovery of “[a]ny written report or document, or portion thereof, concerning a physical or mental examination, or scientific test or experiment”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. BufordNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ProvenzanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Constantine v. LetoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Constantine v. LetoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. BurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. DeFreitasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. GrimmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. HatchcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.