Legal Opinion

Muhammed v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 2, 1989No. CR 89-168PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant, Wali Muhammed, formerly a member of the bar, was charged with and convicted of second degree forgery and theft by deception. The case was certified to this Court by the Court of Appeals as one involving the interpretation of an act of the General Assembly. We affirm the convictions.

At the time of the criminal acts, appellant’s license to practice law in state courts had been suspended, but his federal license was still valid. Accordingly, appellant represented a Thomas Phillips in federal bankruptcy court, in a Chapter 13 proceeding, but did not represent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Mayes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. State v. EsmondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JoshuaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API