Legal Opinion

People v. Tullie

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1985No. Docket 74315PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797. He was sentenced to a minimum of 8 years and a maximum of 20 years imprisonment. Defendant appeals to this Court as of right.

Defendant’s first claim is that there was insufficient evidence to satisfy the armed element of the crime of armed robbery. At trial the complainant, Mary Conry, testified that the assailant held his hand in his pocket indicating he had a gun. This evidence was sufficient to support conviction for armed robbery. A defendant may be convicted for armed robbery even if the weapon was not actually…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. KristMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. JollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. FikeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. DeMeyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. CalhounMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API