Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Du Maurier

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 30, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendant Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc., for a summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it.

The affidavits disclose the following among other facts from which the triers of the issues may reasonably infer that Daphne Du Maurier had access to plaintiff’s copyrighted works: the issue of Hearst’s International magazine for October, 1924, in which plaintiff’s copyrighted story “I Planned to Murder My Husband” appeared, was sold in England, where Du Maurier resided; plaintiff’s copyrighted book “Blind Windows” was published and sold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. MacDonald v. Du MaurierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Ætna Life Ins. v. HagemyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Short v. Hotel Riviera, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. MacDonald v. Du MaurierDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Reyher v. Children's Television WorkshopDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API