Empire Glass & Decoration Co. v. Bussey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. It is not necessary that an employee work exclusively for liis employer, in order to be “regularly in service,” as provided in section 15 of the Georgia workmen’s compensation act (Ga. L. 1920, p. 167).
2. Since the workmen’s compensation act expressly provides that an employee whose contract of employment is made within this State with an employer whose place of business is within this State, if the contract does not expressly provide that the entire service contracted for shall be performed outside of this State, may in a proper case recover compensation for -an injury sustained by him…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bussey v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Clark v. GEORGIA KRAFT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Poulnot v. Dundee Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Willingham v. Eastern AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- DeKalb County Merit System v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979