Legal Opinion
Willis v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the respondents’ contention, under the particular facts of this case, the Supreme Court’s order dated April 9, 2008, was effective to return the action to pre-note of issue *675status (see Dokaj v Ruxton Tower Ltd. Partnership, 55 AD3d 661, 661-662 [2008]). Since CPLR 3404 was inapplicable to this pre-note of issue action, it did not provide a basis for dismissal of the action (see Lane v New York City Hous. Auth., 62 AD3d 961, 961 [2009]; Sellitto v Women’s Health Care Specialists, 58 AD3d 828, 828-829 [2009]; Dokaj v Ruxton Tower Ltd. Partnership, 55 AD3d 661, 661-662 [2008];…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Travis v. CuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Galati v. C. Raimondo & Sons Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lane v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Dokaj v. Ruxton Tower Limited PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Downey Savings & Loan Ass'n, F.A. v. AribisalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Ortiz v. Wakefern Food Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016