Legal Opinion

Clough v. Fellows

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plea of fraud need not set forth the names of the creditors, the amounts due them, or the nature or dates of their claims. At the trial term, an order can be made for the defendant to furnish a specification on the subject, if it is needed. The demurrer to this plea is overruled.

The plea of paramount title could be allowed if it would be a just and convenient step of procedure in this case. Metcalf v. Gilmore, 59 N.H. 417,434; Rutherford v. Whitcher, 60 N.H. 110, 112. But the question raised by it cannot be justly or conveniently tried with the other questions. The nature and extent of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. GilmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  2. Rutherford v. WhitcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Owen v. WestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API