Legal Opinion

Ingham v. Turner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1979No. 78-1826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action involves the validity of a document executed by plaintiff which purports to be an irrevocable disclaimer of a remainder interest subject, however, to its validity under § 2518 of the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 of the United States Code. The district court1 granted the motion to dismiss interposed by those defendants who are Internal Revenue Service officers. Ing-ham v. Hubbell, 462 F.Supp. 59, D.C. (1978). *316Plaintiff has appealed that dismissal. Upon reviewing the record in this case, the court is persuaded that this suit is one with respect to federal taxes and as such is not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ingham v. HubbellDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Ingham v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. McGraw v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API