Kline v. Chase
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Seventeenth District. Plaintiff sues to recover four hundred and forty-five dollars rent of certain property described in the complaint, claiming as the purchaser of the premises at Sheriff’s sale under a decree in the case of Kline v. Chase, a former suit between the same parties. The defendant here was the judgment debtor there.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Seventeenth District. Plaintiff sues to recover four hundred and forty-five dollars rent of certain property described in the complaint, claiming as the purchaser of the premises at Sheriff’s sale under a decree in the case of Kline v. Chase, a former suit between the same parties. The defendant here was the judgment debtor there. The premises were sold on the ninth of July, 1859, were bid in by plaintiff, and redeemed by defendant on the first of August following, by the payment of the judgment and costs, (the amount bid) and twelve per cent. This suit was commenced Oct. 22d,…
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Cope, J. concurring.
Judgment affirmed, for the reasons given by the Judge below in his opinion. It is unnecessary to state these reasons, since the principles governing the case have already been settled in Harris v. Reynolds, (13 Cal.) and other cases.
See Knights v. Truett, 18 Cal.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Otis v. McMillan & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Walls v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Whithed v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Kane v. MinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.