Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bemis Bro. Bag v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 6, 1922No. 2137Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION BY

SMITH, JUDGE.

I concur in the conclusion reached.

The goods are represented by two exhibits, one of which, Exhibit 3, is a plain-woven fabric composed of uncolored jute yarns with the exception of a stripe three-eighths of an inch from the edge, into the warp of which stripe is woven six threads or yarns colored blue, and to that extent differing from the other threads or yarns composing the fabric. Exhibit 4, the other exhibit, differs from Exhibit 3 in the particular only that.the warp threads of the stripe are red instead of blue.

On the hearing before the board, Morris…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. United States v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Lloyd Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Psaki Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API