Legal Opinion

Grandin v. Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 1982No. AL-299Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Judge.

Appellant asserts that the Parole and Probation Commission committed several errors in assigning his presumptive parole release date. We disagree and affirm.(1) The number of months assigned appellant exclusive of aggravating factors was within the matrix time range for his offense set forth in the rules. Adequate administrative remedies are available for rule challenges. Canter v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 409 So.2d 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).(2) The Commission properly aggravated appellant’s concurrent sentences pursuant to Rule 23-19.01(5), Fla.Admin.Code. Griggs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lopez v. FLA. PAROLE & PROB. COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Perkins v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Sala v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Canter v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Griggs v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API