Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Leverenz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 12, 1956No. Gen. 10,026PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE BEYNOLDS

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal growing out of what is commonly known as a “Dram Shop Case.” Suit was brought by Mildred Hudson and her three minor children, Sharon Kay Hudson, David Lee Hudson and Michael Edward Hudson, against Don Leverenz, Mary A. Connor, Stanley B. Smith and Frank Davison, tavern operators, under the Dram Shop statute, for damages growing out of the death of Clinton Lee Hudson, husband of Mildred Hudson and father of the minor children. Clinton Lee Hudson was killed in an automobile accident when the automobile in which he was riding,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stephens v. KastenIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Morrison Hotel & Restaurant Co. v. KirsnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. PrickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Osgood v. SkinnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Reese v. LaymonIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hudson v. LeverenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Schmitt v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Grant v. PaluchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Bevins v. Comet Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Watson v. FischbachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API