Legal Opinion

United States v. Randy Fink

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2004No. 03-3369Unpublished

1Per curiam

Randy Fink appeals his commitment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, and we grant him leave to do so in forma pauperis. After careful review, we affirm the district court’s 1 order, entered after a hearing, because the finding that Fink suffers from a mental disease or defect for which he requires treatment in a suitable facility is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Eckerson, 299 F.3d 913, 914-15 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Timothy EckersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API