Legal Opinion · Concurrence

The King v. Testa

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888Published

On Question Reserved.

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion of

Preston, J.

I concur in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice, and in the declaration that the Act in question is unconstitutional and therefore void, and have but little to add.

It was argued by the Attorney-General that as the offices of Third and Fourth Associate Justices were created by an Act of the Legislature, therefore the offices might be abolished by another Legislature repealing such law; and he also contended that such offices were held by virtue of such law only. But he conceded that if the offices were held by virtue of the law and under the Constitution,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tibbs v. ParrottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1804

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API