Althouse v. Hunsberger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 92, Oct. T., 1897, by defendant, from order of C. P. Berks Co., May T., 1897, No. 48, discharging rule to vacate judgment. Rule to vacate or set aside judgment. Before Ehdlich, J. Judgment was entered by a magistrate against Mrs. James B. Hunsberger for $28.00. Transcript was filed in the common pleas.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 92, Oct. T., 1897, by defendant, from order of C. P. Berks Co., May T., 1897, No. 48, discharging rule to vacate judgment. Rule to vacate or set aside judgment. Before Ehdlich, J. Judgment was entered by a magistrate against Mrs. James B. Hunsberger for $28.00. Transcript was filed in the common pleas. A rule subsequently was taken to vacate, which upon hearing was dismissed in an opinion by Eudlich, J. (in which further facts sufficiently appear), as follows: Judgment having been entered against Mrs. James B. Hunsberger by an alderman, a transcript thereof was in due course filed…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The very earnest argument of the defendant’s counsel has failed to convince us that the court committed error in discharging the rule entered in the present case or in entering judgment in the succeeding case. Its action in both cases is so thoroughly vindicated in the opinions filed as to render further discussion unnecessary and unprofitable.
Order affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Field Enterprises Educational Corp. v. GolattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Hughes v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Durbin v. Steele, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County1927