Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meyer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1953No. 13211PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Alame-da, appellee, Rosie Meyer, a citizen of California, brought an action against appellant, Sears, Roebuck & Company, a New York corporation, to recover damages in the sum of $35,000 for personal injuries suffered by appellee and allegedly caused by appellant’s negligence. Oil petition of appellant, the action was removed from the Superior Court to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division. There appellant answered, a jury trial was had, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Sexton v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Granucci v. ClaasenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. James v. BurchettWashington Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kopfinger v. Grand Central Public MarketCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Oldenburg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Davis v. PecorinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. District of Columbia v. Texaco, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Lee v. AshizawaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API