Succession of Prejean
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
FRUGE, Justice ad hoc.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment dismissing their attack on the codicil of the will of Alida Prejean, deceased. The will, which was executed in the form of a nuncupative will by Public Act, contained certain special bequests and' appointed- her. .son,: Odea Boudoin, as her executor.’...The codicil;-also- in-the .form of. nuncupative by Public Act, was executed to appoint the defendant herein, A. J. Thomas, as her executor in lieu of her son, Odea Boudoin, who predeceased her.
Plaintiffs’ attack on the codicil is grounded mainly on five points:
1. That said…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kingsbury v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Succession of YeatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- McCarty v. TrichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Chandler v. BarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
- Rostrup v. Succession of SpicerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stephens v. AdgerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Talton v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Succession of TallutoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Succession of PapaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966