W.R. Grace & Co. v. Parlier
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
In Pearlstein v. King, 610 So.2d 445 (Fla.1992), we held that the 120-day rule for serving a defendant in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j) applies to causes of action pending on January 1, 1989. Therefore, we quash Parlier v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., 596 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) and direct the district court to remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.’*
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
We note that respondents argue that some of the petitioners waived reliance on the 120-day rule by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pearlstein v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Parlier v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Parlier v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993