Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Rivera

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1976Published

1Dissent

Jasen, J. (dissenting).

On this appeal, the sole question before us is whether, 23 years after conviction, a defendant who was not advised of his right to appeal and who, pursuant to People v Montgomery (24 NY2d 130), was resentenced nunc pro tunc so as to commence again the time in which to take an appeal, is entitled to a new trial solely because there no longer exists a transcript of the original trial proceedings, even though the Appellate Division has affirmed a finding that the defendant has failed to raise any appealable issues with respect to the first trial. Since I cannot agree that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. People v. MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API