Legal Opinion

Moore v. Triplett

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 26, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Slienandoah county; R. H. Turner, Judge. Action by J. I. Triplett and others against Kate Gf. Moore and others. Plaintiffs had decree, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRiely, J.

It is claimed by the appellants that the circuit court erred in reading and considering the deposition of Joseph Maphis, taken on February 21, 1888, and the depositions of T. W. Allen, J. B. Ham man, Israel Allen, W. Fitzmoyer, A. Overboltz, and W. H. Ham man, taken on October 10, 1888, all of which depositions were taken by the appellees. The ground of the objection is that the record does not show that the depositions were taken in the presence of the guardian ad litem of the infant parties. It was necessary that the guardian ad litem should have notice of the taking of the depositions, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strayer v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  2. Tebbs v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  3. Walker v. GraysonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  4. Kempner v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Sutherlin v. March, Price & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. TriplettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  2. Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  3. Caperton v. GregorySupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  4. Shields v. SimontonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Field v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API