Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Dellarosa

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 6, 1989No. ACM S27862Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMichalski, Judge

The facts of this case as I see them, persuade me to disagree with that part of my Brothers’ decision to set aside and dismiss the findings of guilty of Charge II and its specification, and accordingly to modify the sentence. The record of trial convinces me the appellant willfully disobeyed his superior commissioned officer.

The commander ordered appellant to get into his uniform and report to his duty station. The commander testified:

He did not answer me. He sat on the bed and simply stared at me without gesture, without any kind of response, just looking at me ... I waited for what I felt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. McLaughlinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. BetheaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. WilsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API