Legal Opinion
North American Land Development v. Tucker
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1994No. 25,991-CWPublished
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge, Pro Tem.
A writ was granted by this court to review the holding of the Monroe City Court that, in order to perfect a suspensive appeal, the suspensive appeal bond must be filed within ten days of the judgment rendered by it as provided by LSA-C.C.P. art. 5002, and that the delay provided by LSA-C.C.P. art. 2128 is inapplicable to city courts.
Procedural Background
Maria Tucker and Enrique Cueto obtained a money judgment against North American Land Development (NALD) in Monroe City Court on July 12, 1993. The judgment was signed and filed on July 14, 1993. NALD timely moved for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haywood v. SalterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- The Research Group, Inc. v. SharpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gissel v. SehdevaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Dusenberry v. AndrusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Yadav v. ProcellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.