Legal Opinion

Vyfvinkel v. Vyfvinkel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 2014No. 5D13-2321PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawson, J.

Frederick J.C. Vyfvinkel appeals from an order finding that he was not entitled to a cumulative annual inflation adjustment to his alimony payment based on the language of the contractual stipulation entered between the parties and adopted in the court’s final judgment. The parties’ agreement provided that:

Alimony shall continue at $4,000.00 per month to be increased only annually beginning January, 2012, at the rate of the “Consumer Price Index” (“CPI”) as such CPI is published from time to time by the U.S. Government. The parties shall utilize the CPI rate as reflected in the last published…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penzer v. Transportation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. American Medical Intern. v. SchellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. BKD Twenty-One Management Co. v. DelsordoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. King v. BrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nabbie v. Orlando OutletDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Nature's Products, Inc. v. NXXI Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Aecom Technical Services, Inc. v. Professional Service Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  4. Heather Washington v. VyStar Credit UnionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  5. IPS Avon Park Corporation v. Kinder Morgan, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API