Legal Opinion

Hanrahan v. Hanrahan

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Decided December 22, 1899Published

1Opinion of the Court

STOOKBRIDGE, J.—

'The bill in this, ease sets forth the marriage of the parties in 1883, that *65they lived together for ten years, and that the plaintiff then was compelled to leave her husband, and that for the last six years they have lived separate and apart. The bill does not ask for a divorce, but the first prayer is for the award of permanent alimony, and the second for the allowance of alimony pendente lite and counsel fee.

The defendant being summoned, has filed a demurrer to so much of the bill as asks an award of alimony pendente lite and counsel fee.

Two questions are thus presented for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Feigley v. FeigleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  4. Wallingsford v. WallingsfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1825
  5. McFarland v. McFarlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API