Legal Opinion

De Amat v. United Natural Foods, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 15, 2024No. 8:21-cv-02323Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JANET DE AMAT, * □ Plaintiff, * . . ve * Civil No. 21-2323-BAH UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC., SUPERVALU INC., .* Defendants. 7% * * * * * * * * * * * , MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Janet De Amat brought suit against her former employers, United Natural Foods, Inc. “UNFI”), and SuperValu, Inc. (“SuperValu,” and, collectively, ‘““Defendants”), alleging: discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e ef seg. (“Title VII”); the Americans. with Disabilities Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 12101

ef seg. (the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API