Valtierra v. Housing Authority of City of San Jose
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PECKHAM, District Judge.
This matter comes before this Court on plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment, their applications for an injunction, and defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs ask that we declare Article XXXIV of the California State Constitution 1 to be unconstitutional and request that we forbid defendants from relying upon it as a reason for not requesting federal assistance with which to finance low-income housing. We hold Article XXXIV to be unconstitutional. See Hunter v. Erickson, 393 U.S. 385, 89 S.Ct. 557, 21 L.Ed.2d 616 (1969).
Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 creates a cause of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- James v. ValtierraSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- G & D Holland Construction Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Rebecca Wright v. The City of Brighton, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.