Legal Opinion

Antinerella v. Rioux

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 6, 1995No. File 538919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.

The distinction between a public officer’s personal and official acts has confounded courts for centuries. That distinction must be articulated here in the context of a now epic dispute between the defendant, Alfred J. Rioux, the former high sheriff of Hartford county, and the plaintiff, Joseph Antinerella, his former deputy.

This question comes before me on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The submissions of the parties reveal that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. The issue presented, at least at this early stage, is one of law.

The relevant facts can be briefly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. KupchunosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API