Legal Opinion

Hines v. Donovan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 20, 1958No. 4605PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The first issue to be decided is whether the plaintiff James I. Hines or the defendant C. Lovell Bean was the effective cause of the sale of the real estate of Violet Donovan. On this question the Trial Court has found in favor of the plaintiff Hines. It seems unnecessary to detail the evidence because we believe that the Court’s conclusion is a permissible one on the record before us. It follows that the defendant’s exception to this finding is overruled. The plaintiff therefore is entitled to the commission (Williams v. Walker, 95 N. H. 231) unless there are other barriers to his recovery.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mussman's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  2. Stephenson v. StephensonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  3. In re Estate of McCoolSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Meinhard-Commercial Corp. v. Hargo Woolen MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. State v. DexterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API