Legal Opinion

Sampsell v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1948No. L. A. 20369Published

1Opinion of the Court

32 Cal.2d 763 (1948)

PAUL W. SAMPSELL, JR., Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

L. A. No. 20369.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 1, 1948.

McLaughlin, McGinley & Hanson and J. A. McLaughlin for Petitioner.

Martin S. Ryan, Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Douglas De Coster, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

Petitioner, plaintiff in a divorce action pending in respondent court, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to hear his application for an order pendente lite awarding him custody of the minor child of plaintiff and defendant.

T…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API