Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Schwalb

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 28, 1989No. 87-1979Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

493 U.S. 40 (1989)

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO.

v.

SCHWALB ET AL.

No. 87-1979.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 3, 1989

Decided November 28, 1989[*]

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

William T. Prince argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs were Edward L. Oast, Jr., John Y. Richardson, Jr., and Joan F. Martin.

Christine Desan Husson argued the cause pro hac vice for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With her on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Bryson, Deputy Solicitor General Shapiro, Allen H. Feldman, and Charles I.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · White; Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. SchwalbSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API