Morris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This cause is submitted on a rehearing concerning the sufficiency of the eighth count of the indictment. Our opinion on all other phases of the case (161 Fed. 672) remains unaffected. This second consideration would probably have been unnecessary, if our attention had been attracted to the particular defect of the eighth count ■'which is now urged upon us. The former opinion discloses that the only consideration given to this count related to its sufficiency in matter of averment to apprise the defendant of the nature and cause o f the accusation against him; but we are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Lessee of Brewer v. BlougherSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Carr v. DuvalSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Petri v. Commercial Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brickey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Shilter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- State v. HollandSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
- Sutton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.