Purex Corp. v. Fay
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentLarry G. Smith, Judge
I do not think “causal relationship” was ever an issue in the proceeding below. Consequently, I disagree with the majority’s decision, which is based upon the majority’s conclusion that “there is a complete lack of competent substantial evidence as to ... a causal relationship” between the accident and the condition for which treatment was ordered. I think the testimony of the claimant shows that she still has the symptoms she experienced after being struck in the back by a forklift over a year prior to the hearing, specifically, pains in the low back area. Her testimony alone is sufficient…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Decks, Inc. of Florida v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Cardinal Industries, Inc. v. DawkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- K-Mart Corp. v. NasoniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Barnett v. EMR TELEMETRYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Herder v. School Board of Palm Beach CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980