Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Fash

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 15, 1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Ray Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

In bringing his action for the recovery of real estate, the plaintiff relied, first, upon a United States patent for military .bounty issued June 12, 1819, to John Nichols, a private. When offered iu evidence the patent was objected to because it was not shown to have been recorded in the land department, nor was the usual memorandum of the fact of record legible. The United States *421statute requires that all patents for lands shall be recorded before they are issued; but, when issued, they must be received as evidence of title, without showing such record.

The usual memorandum is no part of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Youngblood v. VastineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Danforth v. Lindell Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Cashion v. MeredithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Hughes v. McDivittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Cannon v. DemingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Smith v. TimNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API