Watkins v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Error to the Criminal Court of Baltimore City. The writ of error in this case issued out of the Circuit Court for Baltimore city, on the 9th of April 1859, and directed to the Criminal Court of Baltimore city, brings up for review the judgment of the latter court (Stump, J.) pronounced upon the plaintiff, in error. The indictment and judgment are fully stated in the opinion of this court.
1Opinion of the CourtBartol, J.
This case comes before us from the Criminal Court of Baltimore on a writ of error issued by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, and directed to the Criminal Court. The plaintiff in error was indicted for the larceny of a silver watch, valued at six dollars, and, upon a verdict of “guilty,” judgment was pronounced by the court, which, it is contended, was erroneous.
As the alleged error is in the judgment rendered, it is proper for us first to ascertain what judgment was, in point of fact, rendered.
In the record transmitted to this court, it is thus stated:
“ Therefore, it is considered by the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Armstrong v. Mayor of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Cornish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Heyward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932