Manzon v. Greenwald

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellee, as indorsee of a promissory note sued appellants, the makers. The trial court found appellee, to be a holder in due course and awarded judgment in his favor.

Appellants contend that the finding that appellee was a holder in due course was in error because the note was not complete and regular on its face. 1 The claim of incompleteness is based on the fact that the place of payment was not specified in the space provided therefor on the printed form. So far as negotiability is concerned, place of payment is not a material element. 2 The claim of irregularity is…