Integral Resources (PVT) Ltd. v. Istil Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant in a suit for tortious interference with a contract. The primary issue is the choice of law to be used in resolving the dispute. We agree with the District Court that the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred provides the applicable law. We will affirm the judgment of the District Court.
In November 1995, plaintiff Integral Resources (PVT) Limited (“Integral”), a Pakistani corporation, entered into a contract with Progress, a corporation owned by the government of Ukraine. The agreement provided…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v. Chemrite (Pty) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Robeson Industries Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company Zurich Insurance Company Continental Insurance Company. In Re: Robeson Industries Corp., Debtor, Robeson Industries Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company Zurich Insurance Company Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Herring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Phoenix Canada Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Barrera v. MonsantoSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- HupanSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
- International Construction Products LLC v. Caterpillar Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Joint Stock Company Commercial Bank PrivatBank v. Igor Valeryevich KolomoiskyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.