Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a certiorari in a tax ease, and was argued before Justices Haines and Elmer, by G. A. Allen, for the prosecutor, and M. Beasley, for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Elmer, J.

The prosecutor of this certiorari complains that he has been illegally assessed, in addition to the sums authorized by law, for his share of a sum voted by special town meeting, illegally convened, to be paid as bounty for volunteers, and for a sum assessed for losses and incidentals. Had .he shown, by competent evidence, that his complaint is well founded, he would be entitled to relief, it being very certain that the town meeting, even if properly convened, had no legal authority to raise money for either of those purposes. *450But there is no…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BlackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API