Legal Opinion

United States v. Antar

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 25, 1994No. 93-5732, 93-5733 and 94-5006UnknownCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

We are confronted ■ in this case with a tension between two issues of critical constitutional concern: the need to protect the confidentiality of jurors’ deliberations while, at the same time, guaranteeing the right of the press and the public to have access to court proceedings. We conclude that under the circumstances presented here, the district court improperly sealed the transcript of the jury voir dire and then upon unsealing it, placed certain improper restrictions on the use of the juror-identifying information. We will, therefore, reverse the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AntarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Jabree WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Michael Camoin v. Nelnet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  4. Merry Reed v. Kevin DevlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. Pro Publica, Inc. v. ButlerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API