Legal Opinion

Bradley v. State Ex Rel. Rockwell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 4, 1923No. 1 Div. 262Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

ANDERSON, C. J.

We have considered with care and interest the able and exhaustive brief of counsel, wherein it is urged that the conclusion of this court that the act in question is repugnant to section 23 of the Constitution of 1901 is wrong. IPirst, we do not take issue with the general assertion that the Legislature has the power to enact all laws not prohibited by the Constitution, or with the suggestion that what is termed an “assessment for local improvements” does not fall within the restrictive provisions of our Constitution in dealing with taxation, as held in Birmingham…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Birmingham v. KleinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. City of Decatur v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Dillard v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Harkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API