Legal Opinion

Cantor v. Axelrod

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*967OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, the petition dismissed and the Commissioner’s determination reinstated.

The Commissioner’s determination that the real property lease was between related parties within the meaning of 10 NYCRR 86.28 (now 10 NYCRR 86-2.26) is supported by substantial evidence. The hearing officer found that Cantor was the original owner of the property, having purchased it in 1969 for $235,000. When he sold it to Simensky in 1971 for $500,000, the sales price was agreed to without any negotiations, and was not…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EastonNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. Brooklyn Psychosocial Rehabilitation InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Benenson v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Rockaway Care Center v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API