Legal Opinion

United States v. Kaiser Aetna

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided February 6, 1976No. Civ. 73-3864PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

PENCE, District Judge.

The United States, for its Corps of Engineers, asks for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, seeking a declaration that the waters of Kuapa Pond, now more generally known as Hawaii-Kai Marina, are navigable waters of the United States, and that defendants must obtain authorization from the Corps for any future construction, excavation or filling in the marina, in accordance with § 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 403 (1970). Plaintiff also requests that this court enjoin the defendants from interfering in any way with public access to the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Leslie Salt Co. v. FroehlkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Jane O. Livingston, Administratrix of the Estate of Haldon C. Livingston, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API